Webinar | Women’s Nutrition: Nourishing Womanhood From Pregnancy To Menopause
11 September | 12 PM ET: Register Now
Webinar | Women’s Nutrition: Nourishing Womanhood From Pregnancy To Menopause
11 September | 12 PM ET: Register Now
Discover The Impact of In-Depth IP Research & Strategies
Value Delivered The client moved from a claim that looked unprovable on paper to an infringement case backed by spectrometer-verified evidence. The patent claimed an LED lamp whose emitted light
Value Delivered The client extended one already-charted asset from a single generation of Wi-Fi to three, without a new filing. Claim 1 of the patent covers segmented channel sounding feedback
Value Delivered The client entered the royalty conversation knowing which asserted patents genuinely read on Wi-Fi 6 and which did not, with the evidence to show it. Five patents, each
Value Delivered Before submitting a Wi-Fi 6 pool, a patent owner needed to know which of their patents read on the standard. Running that claim through GreyB’s SEP Checking Tool
Challenge The patent family pointed back to 2017 through continuity, shared inventorship, and a common autonomous-agent theme. But family-level continuity does not show whether every limitation of the final claim
Challenge The specification never explained what “arrival-time bounds” meant or how it differed from a conventional ETA, and the patent’s own prosecution history added no clarity. Without a clear claim
Challenge The examiner allowed the claims because of a VPN feature, yet that limitation never made it into the issued independent claims. It was unclear how to use this gap
