Turn Weak Invalidity Contentions into Winning Arguments

A single missed prior art reference or weak argument could be the difference between success and failure. Ensure your contentions are airtight, well-researched, and backed by solid legal reasoning.

Lawfirms impressing clients with our help

Complete litigation support from start to end.

Your time is precious. GreyB’s litigation support services are aimed at helping you focus on winning litigation and worrying less about administrative and research intensive tasks.

Pitch summary document

Claim Construction Support

Litigation Grade Prior Art Search & System Prior Art Search

Search Results Analysis Support

Invalidity Contention Preparation

Expert Report Preparation

Damages Report – Technical Support

Where GreyB can help?

Prior art

Comprehensive Prior Art Search

Patents, publications, products, or anywhere else – If it exists, we will find it™. Having worked on 3000+ prior art searches in 80+ high tech areas, GreyB has the expertise to give you the right results to win the case.

Detailed Claim Mapping

Mitigate the risk of falling behind and ensure compliance with evolving standards. Get a comprehensive overview of the latest advancements, trends, and regulations shaping the packaging industry.
Investigation Prior art
legal drafting

Legal Argumentation and Drafting

Our experts craft comprehensive legal arguments, integrating prior art and claim mapping to build a strong case for invalidity. We leverage our deep understanding of patent law to ensure your contentions are both robust and defensible.

Expert Consultation and Testimony

GreyB connects you with seasoned experts who provide authoritative opinions and affidavits to strengthen your invalidity contentions. Their testimony can be crucial in proving the non-obviousness or anticipation of the claims in question.
Expert Consultation
Legal Precedents

Strategic Use of Legal Precedents

We strategically incorporate relevant legal precedents to reinforce your invalidity arguments, grounding them in established case law.

Secondary Considerations (Graham Factors)

Our analysis includes secondary considerations such as commercial success, long-felt but unsolved needs, and the failure of others, providing a comprehensive viewpoint on the obviousness of the patent claims.
Secondary Considerations

Why work with GreyB?

Save your expensive time to be more competitive

Turn Invalidity contention preparation time into client value. Let us handle the tedious tasks so you can focus on winning.
process-on-vm-line

Strengthen litigation process and reduce delays

The litigation timeline is crucial, and timely arguments can shift a case. GreyB handles research, analysis, and drafting, letting you focus on strategy.

Collaborative approach

We connect your litigation team with our experts for seamless collaboration, ensuring real-time feedback and alignment on invalidity arguments.

Iterative Review and Refinement

Set up a review process for the law firm to provide feedback, address gaps or inconsistencies, and incorporate their input into the final invalidity contentions before filing.

Alignment with Overall Case Strategy

Integrate the invalidity contentions with the law firm’s case strategy, including infringement arguments and damages calculations. Evaluate how they complement and strengthen the overall defense.

Coordination with Expert Witnesses

We coordinate between our researchers and expert witnesses to align testimony with the invalidity contentions, ensuring a cohesive and convincing case.

How We Exceed Your Expectations, Every Step of the Way

Transparent Communication That Keeps You in the Loop
From the moment the project kicks off, you’ll receive real-time updates on key findings, insights, and developments. No guesswork, no waiting—just regular, meaningful communication that keeps you aligned with every stage of the journey.
Results categorically arranged based on relevance

Tier 1 being highly relevant and anticipated as 102 prior art, tier 2 anticipated as 103 and tier 3 the category A arts.

Glaring proof of overlapping art

Overlaps based on the concepts located in prior art, not the word matching and are supported with analyst comments to make the interpretations crystal clear.

Talk to our Leaders With 1500+ Open Innovation Triumphs.

Assistant Vice President
Helping formulate R&D and business strategies for solving a variety of vexing problems using IP data and derive actionable insights.
Assistant Vice President
Helping companies solve their most complex litigation and R&D problems since the past twelve years.
Group Manager
Assisting businesses maximize their IP value with a proven track record in infringement and monetization strategies.

Exceptional Team, Rewarding Results.

Read Recent Case Studies

Trusted Resources

Expand your knowledge horizons with featured insights. Read new perspectives with an unbiased approach. Learn latest trends and unlearn outdated information.

Daily Curated Blogs

Want to know more?

Get In Touch For Instant Answers.