July belonged to Tesla. The automaker drove the month’s docket 13 petitions, every one instituted as its seven-patent campaign against NPE Bulletproof Property Management cleared institution and it swept Charge Fusion’s EV-charging patents at final decision. Automotive surged to nearly a quarter of all tracked cases. The broader numbers moved with it: institution climbed to 55% (from 44% in June), and once petitions were instituted, challengers dominated 14 of 24 final decisions cancelled the patent outright. The discretionary gate stayed the main obstacle: 71% of July’s denials were discretionary, still driven by parallel-court timing. The message of the month: get past institution, and the merits are increasingly falling the petitioner’s way.
Shallu Dhauta
Overview
55%
July institution rate
July institution rate across GreyB's tracked decisions (29 of 53) up sharply from 44% in June
Two IPRs against an EV-charging NPE’s patents, decided at final written decision (July 13).
Held
All challenged claims cancelled in both proceedings a clean petitioner sweep.
Why it matters
Tesla’s month in one case: it wiped out a charging-tech NPE at final decision the same month its seven-petition campaign against Bulletproof Property Management cleared institution. The EV- patent fight is now Tesla’s to lose.
Micron Technology v. Yangtze Memory Technologies Co.,
IPR2025-00190, -00191, -00228
Posture
Three more final decisions in the ongoing memory campaign against a Chinese maker (early–mid July).
Held
One patent fully cancelled, one partially cancelled, one survived intact a genuine split.
Why it matters
The Micron–YMTC fight that ran through June continued into July with a mixed result proof that even a strong, sustained campaign does not take every patent, and each claim set fights on its own
record.
Samsung's challenge to a smart-ring maker's patent, decided at final written decision (July 10).
Held
All challenged claims survived a clean win for the patent owner.
Why it matters
A wearables innovator held its ground against a giant. In a month when petitioners won most fights, this is the counter-example: a well-drafted patent can still beat a deep-pocketed challenger on
the merits.
Want PTAB decisions before everyone else? Subscribers get the current month on day one.
Institution: 55% (29 granted of 53 decided in July). Denials: 24 – 71% discretionary (17), 6 on the merits, 1 procedural. Of the discretionary denials, 13 turned on parallel-court timing (Fintiv). The busiest refusals: Cisco drew three straight Fintiv denials against OptimNet, and Uber’s challenge to Carma Technology was denied on the same ground. The gate is still where petitions die but fewer died there in July than in June.
Parties & Counsel
MOST ACTIVE PARTIES - JULY
Challenger
Petitions
Tesla
13 (all instituted)
Google
8
Uber Technologies
5
Cisco Systems
4
Medtronic / Samsung
3 each
Most-challenged owner
Challenges
Bulletproof Property Mgmt (NPE)
7
Carma Technology (NPE)
5
SoftView (NPE)
4
Headwater Research / IV II
3 each
By the numbers
Final decisions favored challengers. Of 24 final written decisions in July: 14 cancelled all claims (58%), 4 cancelled some, and 6 patents survived intact so petitioners took 14, patent owners 6, and 4 split. That is a 75% any-invalidation rate once a case reaches final decision. Nearly every July petition (12 of 13 tracked multi-filings) came as part of a coordinated campaign rather than a single shot.
On the docket - what to watch
The EV showdown is set. With Tesla's seven petitions against Bulletproof Property Management now instituted, the final decisions in that campaign will be the bellwether for electric-vehicle patent disputes watch them land over the coming months. And with automotive now a top-three PTAB industry, expect more carmaker-versus-NPE fights to follow.
Don't wait a month for this.
Subscribe to The PTAB Pulse and get the latest edition the day it drops – institution data, decision analysis, and practice pointers, before anyone else.