Webinar | Asian Beauty Trends: Ingredients, Formats, and R&D signals
30th June | 12 PM ET: Register Now
Webinar | Asian Beauty Trends: Ingredients, Formats, and R&D signals
30th June | 12 PM ET: Register Now
The gap between what is declared and what is deployed is the most important number in licensing negotiations.
We mapped 5,000+ patents against certified products across three device categories.
Here is what we found.
Most Wi-Fi 6 licensing conversations anchor on declaration counts and standard mapping. The question no one is asking, and no one is answering, is whether the market actually implements your portfolio.
Asserting on features with low or no real-world deployment creates credibility problems at the table. A licensee who can show non-implementation has a lever that's hard to counter.
Without deployment data, licensees accept assertions covering features their products don't implement at meaningful scale, sometimes 40%+ of the patents in a demand.
A smartphone licensing strategy applied to IoT devices will fail. The feature adoption profile is almost inverted, what's universal in smartphones is niche in IoT.
This isn't a matter of reading the standard. The insight comes from mapping certifications against features at scale, hundreds of products, thousands of patents, across all three domains.
A structured walk-through of what the deployment analysis actually reveals — feature by feature, domain by domain. Every agenda item maps to a real licensing scenario.
The industry's default metric anchors on declared portfolios and family sizes. We show why deployment intensity is what moves the needle in negotiations, and why the gap between the two is larger than most expect.
A walkthrough of the three-tier classification methodology: High, Medium, Low adoption — built from certified product data, not standard-reading. How the framework was validated, and what it captures that traditional SEP analysis misses.
Every major Wi-Fi 6 feature mapped against all three device domains simultaneously. We walk through the data points that will surprise you — including which features are universally deployed, which are domain-specific, and which are in the standard but not yet in the market.
Three domains, three completely different licensing realities. Smartphone coverage is deep and concentrated. Automotive is binary. IoT is almost an inversion of the smartphone profile. We break down what that means for licensing strategy in each category — and why a single playbook fails all three.
Five anonymised Wi-Fi 6 patent holders, each mapped against the adoption tiers across all three domains. The strategic profiles are strikingly different — and the implications for current and future licensing leverage are concrete. We walk through what each portfolio does well, and where the gaps are.
When you can say "this feature is in 70% of your certified products, here is the data" — that is a different room than one anchored on declarations. We show how deployment data functions as a negotiation lever for both sides, and what it takes to make that argument defensible.
Your Hosts
Host and Moderator
Free Access
Register free. Access the full recording. Take back a framework your team can apply immediately, in the next negotiation, for any device category, against any portfolio.
