Cracked a high-profile patent invalidity case for a Bluetooth-based application in just 24 hours
Value Delivered
The older blog post from a company provided precisely the kind of prior art needed: a clear description of the technology predating the patent claim, which served as a cornerstone for a strong argument against the patent’s novelty. This crucial evidence placed at the disposal of those confronting the patent significantly shifted the balance of the proceedings.
Problems Solved
Despite an initial set of 3,000 patents, none revealed the specific functionalities related to “automatic Bluetooth reply.” Additionally, the most relevant and demonstrative online resources, including blogs and video content, concerning the patented technology, were published after the cut-off date.
Solution Offered
To find potential leads, we first reviewed materials published shortly after the critical date of the patent. However, we discovered a company with an app that had the desired features but was developed after the cutoff date. So, we expanded our search to track companies with similar applications and found one that had acquired an application containing the patent’s novel technology.
During our thorough examination of the company’s public communications, we found a blog post dated before the cutoff that detailed the concept in question.
Get the full case study to discover how GreyB successfully invalidated the patent and overcame initial challenges.
